Machine Tool Genome Project
  • Home
  • RCSA
    • MTGP Registry
    • Request for Artifact Test
    • Request for Best Speed
    • Chatter Analysis
  • Training

Toolholder Comparison

9/26/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
​One more time. Figure 1 are the stability lobe diagrams for the same endmill in the same machining center, sticking out exactly the same amount from five different toolholders. Which one is the shrinkfit? The hydraulic? The power shrink? The milling chuck? The side lock? I am not telling (and not stupid enough to do so). In Figure 2 we changed to the same type endmill, but longer, and you can see the results are vastly different. Winners and losers are different. Take-aways: you cannot predict the best toolholder without measuring the system's dynamics and shorter is not always better.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    About Us

    Sharing information about high performance milling technologies, the result of 30 years of research.

    Archives

    August 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018

    Categories

    All
    Chatter
    Dynamics
    Endmills
    Milling
    Shophacks
    Testing
    Toolholders

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn

Machine Tool Genome Project
Copyright © 2018-2020

DISCLAIMER
  • Home
  • RCSA
    • MTGP Registry
    • Request for Artifact Test
    • Request for Best Speed
    • Chatter Analysis
  • Training